Paper Title

Reading for Meaning and Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition

Author's Name, Institution and E-mail Address

Mariko Wei, Purdue University, moroishi@purdue.edu

Abstract

That second language learners incidentally gain a significant amount of unfamiliar vocabulary while reading for "meaning" has been reported repeatedly by second language acquisition (SLA) researchers (Dupuy & Krashen, 1993; Hulstijn, 1992). Yet, the future research agenda includes such issues as: what the actual mechanism of incidental acquisition is and how instructional intervention could enhance the process of incidental vocabulary learning. Several recent studies have found positive evidence supporting the use of explicit vocabulary instruction in conjunction with extensive reading (Paribakht & Wesche, 1997; Qian, 1996; Zimmerman, 1994). However, in the case of Japanese, there is little research available on this matter, and more empirical studies that investigate whether and how learners of Japanese can expand their vocabulary knowledge from effective vocabulary instruction in tandem with reading in the classroom are needed.

This study addresses the issue of whether intermediate learners of Japanese incidentally acquire and retain unknown vocabulary as a result of extensive reading and further examines whether explicit vocabulary instruction in conjunction with reading for meaning enhances vocabulary learning. 75 learners of Japanese as a foreign language at a U.S. university were randomly assigned to three groups (Reading plus Vocabulary Instruction [RPV], Reading Alone [RA], and control) for learning unfamiliar words in the authentic Japanese texts. The subjects' progress in the use of the target words was measured by receptive and productive tasks, using a pretest and two posttests design. Results indicate that both the RPV and RA treatment groups significantly improved after the instruction, but the gain scores of the RPV group were significantly larger than those of the RA group. Furthermore, the results of the delayed posttest indicate that both experimental groups retained their knowledge of the target words over the five-week period after instruction.


By Author
By Schedule
By Title

Back to ATJ Seminar 2005
Back to ATJ Seminar
Back to JapaneseTeaching.org Homepage